296 / 322
科技管理三重奏：策略視角的分析與評論
296
Parkhe, A. 1993. Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost
examination of interfirm cooperation.
Academy of Management Journal
, 36 (4):
794-829. doi: 10.2307/256759
Penrose, E. 1959.
The Theory of the Growth of the Firm
. New York, NY: Wiley.
Phelan, S., Ferreira, M., and Salvador, R. 2002. The first twenty years of the Strategic
Management Journal.
Strategic Management Journal
, 23 (12): 1161-1168. doi:
10.1002/smj.268
Pierce, J. L., and Delbecq, A. L. 1977. Organization structure, individual attitudes and
innovation.
Academy of Management Review
, 2 (1): 27-37. doi: 10.5465/AMR.
1977.4409154
Polanyi, K. 1944.
The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our
Time
. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Porter, M. E. 1980.
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and
Competitors
. New York, NY: Free Press.
. 1981. The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management.
Academy of Management Review
, 6 (4): 609-620. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1981.
4285706
. 1985.
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
.
New York, NY: Free Press.
. 1996. What is strategy?.
Harvard Business Review
, 74 (6): 61-78.
Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G. 1990. The core competence of the corporation.
Harvard
Business Review
, 68 (3): 79-91.
Radzicki, M. J. 1990. Institutional dynamics, deterministic chaos, and self-organizing
systems.
Journal of Economic Issues
, 24 (1): 57-102. doi: 10.1080/
00213624.1990.11505001
Rindfleisch, A., and Heide, J. B. 1997. Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future
applications.
Journal of Marketing
, 61 (4): 30-54. doi: 10.2307/1252085
Rindova, V. P., and Kotha, S. 2001. Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic
capabilities, form, and function.
Academy of Management Journal
, 44 (6): 1263-
1280. doi: 10.2307/3069400
Rogers, E. 1962.
Diffusion of Innovation
. New York, NY: Free Press.
Rothaermel, F. T., and Hess, A. M. 2007. Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven
by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects.
Organization Science
, 18 (6):
898-921. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0291