Page 178 - 臺大管理論叢第33卷第1期
P. 178

The Effect of Applying Clinical Pathways on Medical Resource Utilization among Patients Undergoing a
               Thyroidectomy



               monitor and review the workflows for the developed CPs.


               2.4 Model and Statistical Analysis
                    Using the CPs developed above, this study compares the differences in medical

               resource consumption among the three groups as follows. The first one is the GS group
               before the CPs’ implementation (GS-BCP group), the second one is the GS group after
               the CPs’ implementation (GS-ACP group), and the third one is the ENT group without the

               CPs. The comparisons are conducted in two ways: one involves a comparison between the
               first and the second patient group within the GS department, i.e., GS-BCP vs. GS-ACP w/
               and w/o CPs, respectively, and the other is that between the second and the third group of
               the GS-ACP and ENT departments, w/ and w/o implementing the CPs, respectively. The
               factors including comorbidities, and surgeon-related and disease-specific characteristics

               are also incorporated into the model to control for their possible effects on medical
               resource utilization.
                    Given the retrospective and observational nature of our study, there is a potential

               risk of selection bias and confounding variables such as the provider’s behaviors that
               may influence the significance of our findings. To address this endogeneity issue, we
               thus estimate the impact of CPs on the LOS and medical care expenses of thyroidectomy
               patients using the Difference-in-differences (DID) method (Athey and Imbens, 2017;
               Wooldridge, 2012). To compare the mean outcomes for the treated and controlled

               variables before and after the CPs’ implementation, the DID analysis requires data on
               the outcomes in the group that receives the CPs’ implementation (GS patients) and the
               group (ENT patients) that does not, both before and after the implementation. For this

               purpose, in addition to the GS-BCP and GS-ACP referred to above, the ENT patients
               are also divided into two groups, ENT-BCP and ENT-ACP, before and after the CPs’
               implementation, respectively. The effect of the CPs on medical resource utilization, i.e.,
               the DID, is estimated from a regression with terms for the group, period, group-by-period
               interaction and other control variables. A dummy variable, i.e., Treatment, is employed

               to distinguish GS patients (Treatment = 1) from the comparison group of ENT patients
               (Treatment = 0). The coefficient of the Treatment dummy represents the differences in
               medical resource utilization between the GS and ENT patients. Another dummy variable,

               i.e., the CPs, is introduced to denote the time period during which the CPs are in place (July


                                                     170
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183