Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  4 /304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 /304 Next Page
Page Background

公司避稅與金字塔結構

4

countries

1

, firms are not required to disclose the structure of corporate pyramids; such

mandatory disclosures in Taiwan provide a natural choice to test our research questions. In

order to measure the “length” of layers, we identify all intermediate layers connecting the

parent company and the lowest-tire firms. That is, the holding company (i.e., the parent

company) at the apex of investment structure indirectly controls firms sitting on the lowest

tier of investment layer through intermediate companies. If firms have multiple chains in

investment structure, we will focus on the longest chain which has the largest number of

intermediate layers, and calculate the number of intermediate layers connecting the parent

company and the lowest-tier firms.

We then examine the association between tax avoidance and the length of corporate

pyramids. Following prior studies (Phillips, 2003; Rego, 2003; Dyreng, Hanlon, and

Maydew, 2010; Robinson, Sikes, and Weaver, 2010), our first measure of tax avoidance is

GAAP effective tax rate, which is designed to capture tax avoidance activities that directly

affect net income via the tax expense. Prior literature suggests that a lower effective rate

reflects higher incidences of tax avoidance (e.g., Gupta and Newberry, 1997; Rego, 2003).

Consistent with our expectation, we find that firms with more layers within the pyramidal

structure engage in more tax avoidance than do firms with fewer layers. Our results are the

same when measuring tax avoidance with cash effective tax rate and long-term cash

effective tax rate over three-year period (five-year period). Our results remain the same

when controlling variables documented in the literature do affect tax avoidance activities,

such as firm size, market-to-book ratio, financial leverage, and etc.

In addition, we measure tax-haven intensity using the number of investees in tax

haven divided by total number of investees and interact the intensity variable with the

number of layers. We find that the well-documented positive association between tax

avoidance activities and having investees in tax haven becomes more pronounced as the

number of layers increases. The results support the notion that the number of layers

facilitates tax avoidance activities.

The relation between layers and tax avoidance may have endogenous issues. In

particular, investment layers help facilitate tax avoidance activities and managers who

intend to engage into tax avoidance activities may tend to build more layers. To mitigate

1 For example, in the US, publicly traded firms are required to disclose their subsidiaries in Exhibit 21

of 10K. However, from Exhibit 21 sections of each firm’s annual 10-K report, the whole structure of

pyramidal ownership is not available as firms are not required to disclose the number of layers in

which each subsidiary is located.