Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  45 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

27

卷第

2

45

4.2 Regression Results and Analyses

As a comparison with the results of Beccalli (2007), we first examine the influence of

IT expenditure on banks’ profitability.

11

As mentioned in Section 2, the failure of Beccalli

(2007) to find the positive effect of IT expenditure may be due to inappropriate specification.

We subsequently follow Shalev (2009), Bauwhede (2009), and Brown and Caylor (2009) to

make some modifications to the empirical models of Beccalli (2007).

12

Specifically, one-

year-ahead profitability measures (return on assets, denoted as ROA; return on equities,

denoted as ROE) are regressed on current profitability, IT intensity, and two control variables

(the natural log of market value and debt ratio). The results are displayed in Table 4. As

shown in Column (1), IT intensity is positively and significantly related to the one-year-

ahead ROA; the coefficient is 0.003 while p value is 0.000. Similarly, in Column (2), the

coefficient on IT intensity is 0.039 (

p

= 0.000), even after controlling for the effect of size

(LNMV) and leverage (DER). Taken together, the results in Table 4 demonstrate that firms

investing high amount of IT expenditures enjoy greater profitability and provide preliminary

support for our conjecture that IT expenditures play a critical role in value creation.

11 Barely any study examined the influence of IT expenditure on banks’ profitability in the U.S. banking

industry. Hence, we preliminarily test the association between the above two items in this paper.

12 Even though Beccalli (2007) states in the footnote that she also uses ROA in subsequent periods as the

dependent variable, that paper fails to control for the influence of current ROA and other determinants

(i.e., the specification is deficient to some degree). In the typical specification applied in accounting

literatures (e.g., Shalev, 2009; Bauwhede, 2009; Brown and Caylor, 2009), which uses profitability

measures (e.g., ROA and ROE) as the dependent variable, not only the independent variable of interest

but also current profitability, proxies for size effect (usually the natural log of market values) and for

leverage (usually the debt ratios) are included, so we follow this specification.