Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  363 / 414 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 363 / 414 Next Page
Page Background

363

臺大管理論叢

2016/12

27

卷第

1

363-394

DOI:10.6226/NTUMR.2016.MAR.D104-025

審計委員會權益薪酬之決定因素

摘 要

由於權益薪酬之使用漸趨廣泛,其相關討論增加,再加上審計委員會職責逐漸加重等因

素,促使本研究欲找出哪些因素使得公司給予其審計委員會成員權益薪酬。研究發現代

理問題較嚴重之公司傾向不給予權益薪酬。薪酬委員會中成員同時為審計委員會成員之

比例則與給予權益薪酬之可能性呈顯著正向關係。而審計委員會中董事同時為其他公司

之高階主管之比例越高則公司傾向不給予權益薪酬。本研究期能對審計委員會成員權益

薪酬之相關議題做進一步的補充,幫助釐清採用權益薪酬之決定因素。

【關鍵字】

公司治理、審計委員會、權益薪酬、代理問題

Abstract

The controversy around the rising use of equity-based compensation for audit committee

members and the enhanced responsibilities of audit committee is the basis for this study to

examine the factors that affect a firm’s use of stocks and stock options to remunerate audit

committee members. Our results show that firms having more severe agency conflicts are

less likely to give equity-based compensation to audit committee members. Furthermore,

firms with more compensation committee members sitting on the audit committee are

significantly more likely to compensate audit committee members with stocks and stock

options. Moreover, when more audit committee members are also top managers of other

companies, the probability of equity remuneration for audit committee members is lower.

Given that prior studies find that equity-based compensation for audit committee members is

associated with earnings management, accounting restatement, and internal control

weakness, our study contributes to the literature by identifying the factors that contribute to

the use of equity-based compensation for audit committee members.

Keywords

corporate governance, audit committee, equity-based compensation, agency

conflicts

The Determinants of Equity Compensation for Audit Committee

Members

賴運霆

/

德州大學達拉斯分校會計碩士生

Yun-Ting Lai

, Master Student, Department of Accounting, University of Texas at Dallas

吳淑鈴

/

國立臺灣大學會計學系助理教授

Shu-Ling Wu

, Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, National Taiwan University

Received 2015/8, Final revision received 2016/3