Page 63 - 臺大管理論叢第33卷第1期
P. 63

NTU Management Review Vol. 33 No. 1 Apr. 2023




                   On the whole, outsourcing firms play the role in integrating different modules into a
               whole system. They invest in the architectural knowledge on the basis of understanding
               the interdependencies between modules and the activities surrounding the system so as to
               access to the specific and distinct knowledge owned by the contract providers (Henderson

               and Clark, 1990; von Hippel, 1990). Outsourcing firms can also use project modularity
               to hide knowledge, lower the need of communication among contract providers, and
               set up barriers to imitation when they outsource innovation activities offshore. As such,

               the design of project modularity for an outsourcing innovation activity can be another
               mechanism to capture value and to prevent the knowledge leakage from outsourcing
               innovation activities in the developing countries with weak IPR protection. Therefore, we
               propose the following hypothesis:
                   Hypothesis 3: The developing countries with the greater availability of low-cost,

               high-talented human capital have more likelihood to be selected for outsourcing high-
               project-modularity innovation activities than for outsourcing low-project-modularity
               innovation activities.



                                                3. Methods


               3.1 Data and Sample
                   To test our premises and hypotheses, we collect the primary data from the ORN

               survey. Having been used in many studies (e.g., Elia et al., 2019; Gooris and Peeters, 2016;
               Larsen et al., 2013; Lewin et al., 2009; Massini et al., 2010), the ORN survey contains the
               adoption of different offshoring governance modes and the location choice of different
               offshoring projects by firms, an important feature allowing us to observe the decisions on

               outsourcing innovation activities. Specifically, the ORN survey covers questions including
               why firms offshored, with what projects and what governance modes (e.g., offshore
               outsourcing or captive offshoring), in which year, and where. Based on the survey, we
               construct the dataset consisting of 336 firms that conducted 914 offshore innovation

               activities, defined as software development, product design, engineering, IT, analytical and
               knowledge service, and R&D, across 74 countries from 1990 to 2009. Since we focus on
               the firms’ decisions about offshore outsourcing, we finally define 202 firms that outsourced
               465 innovation activities.



                                                     55
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68