Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  32 /304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 /304 Next Page
Page Background

公司避稅與金字塔結構

32

and (5) personnel training over the five-year time period; the categories listed above

account for the most tax credits issued in Taiwan.

We re-examine our tests by removing high-tech industries (i.e., TEJ industry

classification equals 23) from our sample. Table 8 shows that the number of investment

layers is negatively associated with tax rates for non-high-tech firms. The results suggest

that our results are not driven by companies from a specific industry who are under the

protection from the Statute for Upgrading Industries.

7. Conclusion

We examine whether a firm’s tax avoidance activities are influenced by its

organizational structure (i.e., the number of layers within the corporate pyramid). We

investigate whether organizational complexity, captured by the number of layers,

influences a firm’s tax avoidance level. To address this research question, we employ the

sample of publicly traded companies in Taiwan since all publicly traded companies in

Taiwan are required to disclose information on all of their subsidiaries according to

Criteria Governing Preparation of Affiliation Reports, Consolidated Business Reports

and Consolidated Financial Statements of Affiliation Enterprises

”, which allows us to

calculate the number of layers based on publicly available affiliation information. We find

that firms with more number of layers engage in more tax avoidance. These results

support the notion that the use of corporate pyramid allows the parent firm to have more

opportunities to take tax avoidance activities without being detected. In addition, we

further document that the increase in the number of layers in corporate pyramids helps

facilitate tax avoidance activities, and thus, the negative association between effective tax

rates and the number of subsidiaries operating in tax havens relative to the total number of

subsidiaries becomes more pronounced as the number of layers in corporate pyramids

increases.

The study contributes to a few streams of literature. First, we contribute to the tax

literature by providing evidence that corporate pyramids may explain the channel by

which companies conduct their tax avoidance. Shackelford and Shevlin (2001) call for the

research on the effect of insider control and other organizational factors such as ownership

structure on tax avoidance. While there are various ways to empirically measure

organizational complexity, such as geographic and industry diversification, we identify a

measure, the number of layers, which can serve as organizational complexity as well as