Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  150 /304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 150 /304 Next Page
Page Background

產品受歡迎資訊與網路購物:以消費者解讀為干擾變數

150

incongruence when the narrow-appeal product has a higher sales volume than the broad-

appeal product. The moderator was inferences, which could be a product-related inference

based on quality evaluation or social-related inference based on social comparison. The

relationship among each variable is illustrated in Figure 1. The independent variable and

moderator were between-subjects; thus, there were four conditions in total (a 2*2 factorial

design).

Inferences

(Quality Evaluation vs.

Social Comparison)

Congruency of Popularity

information (Congruence vs.

Incongruence)

Sales Volume

(High vs. Low)

Breadth of Appeal

(Broad-Appeal vs.

Narrow-Appeal)

Purchase Decision

Figure 1 Research Model

3.2 Stimulus Materials

The products used for this experiment were selected based on the following criterion:

low-cost, frequently purchased, and prevalently sold online, such that most of the potential

participants have at least some experiences with them (Grunert and Ramus, 2005).

Following this reasoning, we chose the product category of food, including cookies,

drinks and chips as the products to be purchased by the participants in the experiment. The

broad-appeal and narrow-appeal alternatives for each product were first selected, and then

a norming test was conducted to ensure that the breadth of appeal for each product was

appropriately identified. In total, 50 volunteers participated in the norming test and were

asked to purchase a product out of two alternatives. The results showed that 92% of the

participants chose chocolate cookie vs. 8%, cinnamon cookie; 66%, green tea vs. 34%,

Chinese herbal tea; 78%, BBQ-flavored chips vs. 22%, vegetable-flavored chips. Given