Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  120 / 274 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 120 / 274 Next Page
Page Background

以實質選擇權觀點探討探索性與利用性活動對公司績效之影響:中介效果模型

120

of the global semiconductor billing value obtained from the SIA billing report. The

Herfindahl Index was used to measure industry concentration. Estimated market share was

calculated by dividing the firm’s net sales by the summation of the net sales for all the firms

within SIC 3674 for a given year. The Herfindahl Index was obtained by squaring and then

summing the estimated market shares for all subject firms.

3.4 Analysis of Lag Structure

The effect of exploration on returns may have a lag structure that represents the effect of

previous exploratory activities on current returns. This lag structure is not easy to define, but

techniques have been developed to deal with it.

Lag structure was originally used to investigate the relationship between firm

performance and prior R&D or marketing expenses. The idea was to model these expenses

as the aggregation of expenses over successive periods of time. The aggregation is assumed

to have a specific form and can be determined by one or more parameters. Along with other

variables, this aggregated expense can then be modeled to predict performance. By

minimizing the residual between performance and its predicted value in the model used for

our study, the coefficients of each variable could be estimated and the distribution effect of

prior exploration on performance could be determined (Ravenscraft and Scherer, 1982).

Although most of the literature assumed a constant rate of decline in the R&D influence

on firm performance as the length of the lag increases, this study used a binomial log

structure model (Ravenscraft and Scherer, 1982), which assumed a wide range of plausible

alternative lag shapes such as a bell-shaped distribution in the aggregated prior R&D effect.

This method was initially proposed by Che (1971) and Spitzer (1974) to investigate the

effect of prior marketing expenses on performance. Later, Ravenscraft and Scherer (1982)

adopted it to study the relationship between prior R&D expenses and performance.

Following Ravenscraft and Scherer (1982), after ruling out a contemporary effect in year

zero, we defined the aggregated prior exploration as:

(1)

where

k

is the total lag period, and the weight

w

i

is defined as: