Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  38 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

銀行業資訊科技支出之價值攸關性

38

in the 2008 annual report.

4

Correspondingly, the IT expenditure has been one of the major

items in banks’ non-interest operating expenses, and some leading banks regularly invest

considerable amounts of money in IT-related spending.

In contrast to the practical observation of the importance of IT spending, academic

literature does not provide consistent evidence on the correlation between IT spending and

firm performance. Although some studies argue that investing in IT enhances profitability

(e.g., Barua, Kriebel, and Mukhopadhyay, 1995; Dewan and Kraemer, 2000; Krishnan and

Sriram, 2000), others postulate that increasing IT spending poses a considerable financial

burden and may, ultimately, impair profitability (Loveman, 1994; Brynjolfsson and Hitt,

1996; Clegg, Axtell, Damodaran, Farbey, Hull, Lloyd-Jones, Nicholls, Sell, and Tomlinson,

1997). For example, using a sample of 737 European banks over the period of 1995–2000,

Beccalli (2007) analyzes whether IT expenditure leads to improved performance, which is

measured using both standard accounting ratios and cost-profit efficiency measures. Her

empirical results indicate little relationship between total IT expenditure and improved bank

profitability or efficiency.

5

Martin-Oliver and Salas-Fumás (2008) additionally assess whether increased IT

expenditure contributes to improved productivity measures in banks. Following conventional

production specification, IT capital, along with other inputs

6

, is used as an independent

variable to explain the dependent (output) variables (i.e., the natural log of the sum of loans

and deposits). Their results indicate that IT capital is positively and significantly related to

the output measures; specifically, the increase in the stock of IT capital explains one-third of

that of the sum of loans and deposits. However, they fail to find supporting evidence when

4 “Both the Internet and the financial services industry are undergoing rapid technological changes, with

frequent introduction of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to improving the ability

to serve customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions

to reduce costs. Our ability to compete will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our

customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands.

Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements…”

excerpted from the 2008 Form 10-K of the Bancorp, Inc.

5 In an attempt to identify any positive impact, Beccalli (2007) further suggests that greater emphasis

should be placed on the nature of different types of IT expenditures, rather than treating them as a

generality. Hence, three categories of IT expenditures (to test for any difference in their association with

profitability measures) are defined: computer hardware (HA), software (SO), and services (SE). Her

results show that the sign on the hardware and software expenditure is statistically negative, whereas the

coefficient on IT services is positive. It is suggested that the opportunities related to expenditures in

hardware and software can only be fully exploited when acquired together with external IT services.

6 These control input variables include labor capital, physical capital, and the number of bank branches.