Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  2 / 414 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 2 / 414 Next Page
Page Background

2016 MTPC keynote speech

2

1. Introduction

Many Japanese companies were obliged to reform various aspects of their management

system after the “economic bubble” burst of the 1990s. This led to a drastic change in

various management aspects related to the market, technology, and the social system. These

companies made strenuous efforts to adapt to these changes in the business environment.

Several keywords such as corporate governance reform, rampant merger and acquisition,

new strategic alliance, corporate social responsibility (CSR), results-based personnel

management, and reward management, indicate these changes that spread after the 1990s.

However, these new trends seem to have subsided over the past several years, and these

companies are gradually entering into a new phase where they need to build new structures

in order to cope with the environmental changes. Simultaneously, issues with the newly

established systems have been steadily emerging. Currently, Japanese companies are

exploring a new long-term vision in order to prepare for the future and consider these issues.

Kambayashi (2013) analyzed Japanese management system focusing on four aspects of

corporate management – system, strategy, organization, and personnel management. It

regards the aggregation of the new management system in Japanese companies as the

Japanese style management system. With emphasis on these four aspects, research was

conducted on the basic structure of the Japanese style management system after changes in

the market, technology, and society. Further, specific functions of the basic structure of the

Japanese style management system were studied including a discussion and analysis on the

direction of future changes. As a result, in the fields of organization and human resource

management, Japanese companies introduced a mechanism close to the American style. At

the same time, however, they preserve the “Japanese style” and attempt to explore a

mechanism suitable to Japanese companies.

Reforms of corporate governance were widely discussed in the 1990s in studies on

“Japanese management.” It is the author’s basic understanding that the discussions have

made little progress since Americanization became apparent in governance and the

management system. There have also been few studies conducted on the internal aspects of

an organization that practices traditional Japanese management theory from an academic

viewpoint.

Over the past several years, as Japan has experienced the rapid expansion of

globalization and the full-scale arrival of an aging society with a declining birthrate, the

country has also seen an increase in efforts by government, workers, and employers to

promote and enhance “work-life balance”. For example, at the government level, the “Expert