臺大管理論叢 NTU Management Review VOL.29 NO.2

The Relationship between Board Interlocks and Corporate Tax Avoidance 226 References 李建然、陳信吉與湯麗芬, 2013 ,客戶重要性與審計品質-從簽證會計師角度分析, 當代會計 , 14 卷 2 期: 147-174 。 (Lee, Jan-Zan, Chen, Hsin-Chi, and Tang, Li-Fen. 2013. Client importance and audit quality: Audit-partner level analysis. Journal of Contemporary Accounting , 14 (2): 147-174.) 林嬌能與許彩蓮, 2011 ,家族企業與租稅規劃之關聯性, 會計學報 , 4 卷 1 期: 23-49 。 (Lin, Gai-Neng, and Hsu, Tsai-Lien. 2011. The relationship between family firms and tax planning. Soochow Journal of Accounting , 4 (1): 23-49.) 陳明進與蔡麗雯, 2006 ,財稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究, 管理學報 , 23 卷 6 期: 739-763 。 (Chen, Ming-Chin, and Tsai, Lih-Wen. 2006. Determinants of book-tax income differences and estimation of taxable income. Journal of Management , 23 (6): 739-763.) 陳慧玲、張瑀珊與顏信輝, 2012 ,會計師查核報告簽章方式之探討:司法與證券監 理人員之看法, 會計審計論叢 , 2 卷 1 期: 1-30 。 (Chen, Hui-Ling, Chang, Yu-Shan, and Yen, Sin-Hui. 2012. Investigating audit partner signature styles on audit reports: Perspectives from judiciary practitioners and securities agents. Review of Accounting and Auditing Studies , 2 (1): 1-30.) 黃美祝, 2010 ,財稅差異金額大小對國稅局選案查核之影響, 會計評論 , 50 期: 23-55 。 (Huang, Mei-Juh. 2010. The effect of book-tax differences on audit selection of national tax administration. International Journal of Accounting Studies , 50: 23-55.) 黃美祝與汪瑞芝, 2015 ,企業避稅對負債水準之影響, 會計審計論叢 , 5 卷 2 期: 1-32 。 (Huang, Mei-Juh, and Wang, Jui-Chih. 2015. The effect of corporate tax avoidance on debt levels. Review of Accounting and Auditing Studies , 5 (2): 1-32.) 黃美祝與楊佩璇, 2011 ,集團企業與非集團企業避稅程度之比較, 會計學報 , 4 卷 1 期: 1-22 。 (Huang, Mei-Juh, and Yang, Pei-Hsuan. 2011. The comparison of tax aggressiveness between group and non-group enterprises. Soochow Journal of Accounting , 4 (1): 1-22.) 蔡柳卿、楊朝旭與許慧雯, 2014 ,台灣電子業家族經理人之外部董事會連結與公司 創新:論控制家族代理問題之影響, 臺大管理論叢 , 24 卷 2 期: 181- 212 。 (Tsai, Liu-Ching, Young, Chaur-Shiuh, and Hsu, Hui-Wen. 2014. Family executives' external directorate ties and corporate innovation in Taiwan's electronics industry: The role of controlling family agency problems. NTU Management Review , 24 (2): 181-212.)

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTYzMDc=